TransakcjeOZE.pl
PL
Renewable energy market radar · free public data

24 779 renewable energy projects with building permits

This is the number of first-instance building permit decisions issued since 2016 for solar PV installations, energy storage facilities, wind farms and biogas plants across all 16 voivodeships. We count cases, not register rows, and exclude developments on closed areas and pending applications.

Source: RWDZ GUNB Licence: CC0 1.0 Snapshot as at: 17.09.2026, 08:57 UTC Refresh frequency: once a day

Before drawing conclusions: a building permit does not mean that a project is for sale or that it will be built. The Radar shows market figures, not a listings directory. We do not publish investor names, addresses or decision numbers here.

The market in 2026

Decisions issued from 1 January 2026 to the latest month included in the snapshot. Register updates can be delayed, so the latest month may be incomplete. Each case is counted once, even if the register contains one row for every land parcel it covers.

Projects with permits
1,212
first-instance decisions, all of Poland
Solar PV
945
78% of this year’s cases
Energy storage (BESS)
200
17% of this year’s cases
Wind
28
2% of this year’s cases
Biogas
39
3% of this year’s cases
With energy storage
297
25% of cases mention storage in the project description, including hybrid systems with PV
Median capacity
1.0MW
calculated from 667 cases in which capacity could be extracted from the description
Total capacity
7,562MW
total from the same 667 cases; the remaining descriptions do not state capacity

How to interpret capacity: The register has no separate capacity field. We take the largest MW or kW value stated in the description of the proposed development. The total and median therefore describe only cases in which the investor included capacity in the development name. Total capacity must not be read as capacity that will actually be installed on the grid.

The Radar shows the whole market. Check a specific location and counterparty with Full access

The figures above show how many projects receive permits and where. Before spending money on a specific project, check what the aggregates cannot show: available grid capacity, curtailment risk, the counterparty and connection costs.

Free on this page

Market aggregates from the GUNB RWDZ register: permit counts, technologies, municipalities and authority processing times. Enough to understand the market and choose a direction.

With Full access, for your chosen location

  • available connection capacity from six operators on one map, with full values,
  • renewable generation curtailment risk: where redispatch and negative prices may occur,
  • the Energy Regulatory Office (URE) licence register and the small-scale renewable energy installations register (MIOZE): check a counterparty by tax identification number (NIP) in seconds,
  • a Connection Passport calculated for your capacity: advance payment, security and deadlines.

Full access costs PLN 19 excluding VAT/month (PLN 23.37 including VAT) for the first 3 months, then PLN 199 excluding VAT/month (PLN 244.77 including VAT). Cancel whenever you wish; access continues until the end of the paid month.

Month by month in 2026

Number of building permit decisions for renewable energy projects in each month of the current year.

Show data as a table
MonthDecisions
Loading data…

The latest month may be incomplete because authorities submit decisions to the register with a delay.

How the market has changed since 2019

Number of decisions per year, by technology. Each project is assigned one technology: a description mentioning solar PV and storage is counted as solar PV, while storage is recorded separately as a project feature.

Solar PV Energy storage (BESS) Wind Biogas
Show data as a table
YearTotalPVBESSWindBiogas
Loading data…

The current year is incomplete, so its bar is not comparable with completed years.

Where projects are being developed

The distribution of decisions by voivodeship and the municipalities with the most decisions recorded in the register. The number for a voivodeship indicates how many cases were processed there, not how much capacity will be connected to the grid.

Share of all decisions in the selected period.

Municipalities with the most decisions, from 2016 to date. This comparison uses a national list of the 50 municipalities with the most cases, so some rows disappear when you filter to one voivodeship. We group cases by TERC code and use that code to attach the municipality name from the National Register of Boundaries maintained by the Head Office of Geodesy and Cartography (GUGiK). The locality in the second line is the one recorded in the register: a guide to the area, not the municipality's administrative seat.
No.MunicipalityVoivodeshipProjects
Loading data…

Default view: 20 municipalities from the full comparison.

A high number of decisions in a municipality indicates investor activity and that the authority issues permits, not available grid capacity. Check capacity using Check available connection capacity.

How long it takes to obtain a permit

We count the days from receipt of the application to issue of the decision, case by case. This is the time taken by the first-instance authority, not the entire investment process: zoning conditions and grid connection precede the application, and the appeal period follows the decision. We use cases from the last two years so the figure reflects current practice.

Median
57days
half of cases take less time, half take longer
A quarter of cases within
37days
the duration of the fastest cases, up to the first quartile
One in ten takes more than
139days
this is the tail: one tenth of cases exceeds this threshold
Sample
3,746cases
only cases where the register gives both the application receipt date and the decision date
Voivodeships ranked by shortest median. The “a quarter of cases within” column shows how quickly the authority can issue a decision; “one in ten takes more than” shows the risk that the median does not reveal.
VoivodeshipMedianA quarter of cases withinOne in ten takes more thanCases
Loading data…

How to read this: the median is resistant to individual cases lasting years, which is why we use it instead of the mean. Differences between voivodeships also reflect the cases they handle: where there are more large farms, the procedure naturally takes longer. We exclude cases lasting over four years as recording errors in the register.

Who is developing projects

The register names the investor for each decision, showing who actually takes projects through to the permit stage. The comparison covers 8,979 business entities. We merge names recorded with different spellings; otherwise the same company would rank lower than it should.

Investors with the most decisions. This ranks the number of cases, not capacity or value, so a portfolio of many small installations ranks ahead of a single large farm.
No.InvestorProjects
Loading data…

Default view: 2016 to date.

Why individuals are not listed here: nearly half of the decisions in the register concern individuals building installations at their own home or farm. We publish only business entities identified by the legal form in their name, because this comparison is intended to describe the market, not private investments.

Where the data comes from

Source and licence

Source
Register of Applications, Decisions and Notifications (RWDZ), General Office of Building Control (GUNB), wyszukiwarka.gunb.gov.pl/pobranie.html
Licence
CC0 1.0 (dane.gov.pl, dataset 3467)
Scope
first-instance building permit decisions since 2016, all 16 voivodeships
Snapshot as at
17.09.2026, 08:57 UTC

Data limitations

  • The register does not cover investments in closed areas.
  • The bulk export includes decisions, but not pending applications.
  • Capacity is extracted from the description of the proposed construction works and is not available for every case.
  • A building permit does not mean the project is for sale.

How we calculate the figures

We treat a case as a renewable energy project when its description of the proposed construction works indicates a solar PV installation, energy storage facility, wind power plant or biogas plant. Classification is based on the description, so an unusually worded case may be omitted from the comparison. The register records each case in as many rows as the number of land parcels concerned, so we count cases, not rows. We assign one technology and record storage separately as a project feature to avoid counting a PV and storage hybrid twice.

Refresh frequency: the generator downloads the register and recalculates aggregates once a day. We do not promise more frequent updates or real-time data, because GUNB publishes data in batches.

How to cite: Source: Fundacja EFET / TransakcjeOZE.pl, “Renewable energy market radar”, based on the GUNB RWDZ register (CC0 1.0), as at 17.09.2026. Fundacja EFET prepared these comparisons. The source register is public, so anyone can calculate their own. We provide data to newsrooms and universities on request through our contact page.

Caveats

For information purposes. This material does not replace verification of a project's legal status, examination of grid connection conditions or legal analysis. Fundacja EFET (the platform operator) and HWW Hewelt Wojnowski Lindner i Wspólnicy sp.k. (legal adviser) are not responsible for decisions based on these figures. The radar presents aggregates only: no investor names, addresses, land parcel numbers or decision numbers, although the source register contains some of these data.

Next steps

Related public data: available connection capacity report and the licence and MIOZE registers.